Miss Jury Duty? Go Directly to Jail
Just in case you live in D.C. and ignored a summons for jury duty:
Hoping to send a message about the importance of jury service, the chief judge at D.C. Superior Court recently issued warrants calling for the arrests of 92 District residents who failed to show up. Twelve people have been arrested or turned themselves in this month for contempt of court, and marshals are canvassing the area for more. Those taken into custody had to pay $25 bonds and were given dates to report back to court for a final chance to explain themselves and get back on the calendar for jury service. The penalty for contempt of court could be as high as seven days in jail and a $300 fine.
Canvassing the area? In the past three weeks through my network of friends and acquaintances alone, I know of two people sent to the hospital as a result of crime: one journalist shot and a hill staffer mugged. (These, of course, are but two incidents in a city well-known for violent crime.) Yet, jury duty is now a priority of city officials?
Forget, for a moment, that prosecutors rig the charges to coerce dissuade would-be defendants from exercising their right to jury trial. At least several people who now have arrest warrants in their name have legitimate excuses for not showing up–they don’t live here:
Bryan D. Bender, 36, moved from the District to Alexandria about 13 months ago. The Washington correspondent for the Boston Globe said that he had his mail forwarded but that he had never received any letters from the court.
Glenda Fauntleroy, 40, hasn’t lived in the District in almost a year. Soon after her summer 2007 wedding, Fauntleroy and her husband moved to Indiana. Fauntleroy said that she, too, has mail forwarded to her new home, but that she received no notices.
How could this be?
[D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Rufus G.] King acknowledged that the computer system that pulls names and addresses from various D.C. government databases, including voter, motor vehicle and tax records, was “not current” and was being updated to provide the court with more real-time information on District residents.
So…what you’re saying, Rufus, is that you’re arresting people on potentially bad information? Swell. How do you suppose we fix this?
King said the warrants would only be enforced against District residents. But if people moved out of town and did not alert the court, they still could be arrested if they are stopped in the District on a traffic violation and police discover the warrant, he said.
He suggested that District residents alert the court when they move, inside or outside the city, to avoid such problems. “We don’t have any way of reading your minds. If you move, let us know.”
Dear Mayor Fenty,
I hate your god-forsaken excuse for a city and I booked.
Love,
Sue
Anyone arrested on this charge should demand a jury trial.
No Comments »
Filed under: Behind Every Law..., Profiles in Governance
