Miss Jury Duty? Go Directly to Jail

Just in case you live in D.C. and ignored a summons for jury duty:

Hoping to send a message about the importance of jury service, the chief judge at D.C. Superior Court recently issued warrants calling for the arrests of 92 District residents who failed to show up. Twelve people have been arrested or turned themselves in this month for contempt of court, and marshals are canvassing the area for more. Those taken into custody had to pay $25 bonds and were given dates to report back to court for a final chance to explain themselves and get back on the calendar for jury service. The penalty for contempt of court could be as high as seven days in jail and a $300 fine.

Canvassing the area? In the past three weeks through my network of friends and acquaintances alone, I know of two people sent to the hospital as a result of crime: one journalist shot and a hill staffer mugged. (These, of course, are but two incidents in a city well-known for violent crime.) Yet, jury duty is now a priority of city officials?

Forget, for a moment, that prosecutors rig the charges to coerce dissuade would-be defendants from exercising their right to jury trial. At least several people who now have arrest warrants in their name have legitimate excuses for not showing up–they don’t live here:

Bryan D. Bender, 36, moved from the District to Alexandria about 13 months ago. The Washington correspondent for the Boston Globe said that he had his mail forwarded but that he had never received any letters from the court.

Glenda Fauntleroy, 40, hasn’t lived in the District in almost a year. Soon after her summer 2007 wedding, Fauntleroy and her husband moved to Indiana. Fauntleroy said that she, too, has mail forwarded to her new home, but that she received no notices.

How could this be?

[D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Rufus G.] King acknowledged that the computer system that pulls names and addresses from various D.C. government databases, including voter, motor vehicle and tax records, was “not current” and was being updated to provide the court with more real-time information on District residents.

So…what you’re saying, Rufus, is that you’re arresting people on potentially bad information? Swell. How do you suppose we fix this?

King said the warrants would only be enforced against District residents. But if people moved out of town and did not alert the court, they still could be arrested if they are stopped in the District on a traffic violation and police discover the warrant, he said.

He suggested that District residents alert the court when they move, inside or outside the city, to avoid such problems. “We don’t have any way of reading your minds. If you move, let us know.”

Dear Mayor Fenty,

I hate your god-forsaken excuse for a city and I booked.

Love,

Sue

Anyone arrested on this charge should demand a jury trial.

In-Flight Shock Treatment

From the people who authored color-coded threat levels (we’ve been at “yellow” so long I’m beginning to wonder whether the nation is jaundiced) and the notion that when the shit really hits the fan, the most important thing to have is duct tape–comes the brilliant idea that all airline passengers should wear the equivalent of an electronic dog collar:

A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to this promotional video found at the Lamperd Less Lethal website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers.

This bracelet would:

• take the place of an airline boarding pass

• contain personal information about the traveler

• be able to monitor the whereabouts of each passenger and his/her luggage

• shock the wearer on command, completely immobilizing him/her for several minutes

The Electronic ID Bracelet, as it’s referred to as, would be worn by every traveler “until they disembark the flight at their destination.” Yes, you read that correctly. Every airline passenger would be tracked by a government-funded GPS, containing personal, private and confidential information, and that it would shock the customer worse than an electronic dog collar if he/she got out of line?

Clearly the Electronic ID Bracelet is an euphemism for the EMD Safety Bracelet, or at least it has a nefarious hidden ability, thus the term ID Bracelet is ambiguous at best. EMD stands for Electro-Muscular Disruption. Again, according to the promotional video the bracelet can completely immobilize the wearer for several minutes.

Hell, if it works so well in-flight, let’s just use this as a substitute for REAL ID!

Needless to say, while I am always courteous to service workers, I have some reservations about giving Gladys–the 25 year veteran flight attendant with a short temper, hot flashes, and a nicotine craving–the power to shock me into submission whenever she damn well pleases.

No thanks, Gladys, but feel free to tell DHS where they can put their arm wristband.

I Can’t Believe I Just Read That…

I’ve got nuthin‘:

Here’s one I just never imagined the federal government might take responsibility for: bedbugs.

That’s right. No issue is too small for your Congress to handle. But seriously, judging from the comments so far on H.R. 6068, the Don’t Let the Bed Bugs Bite Act of 2008, people think bedbugs are a problem that Congress should address and that the federal government can help solve.

The bill would create a grant program in the Department of Commerce and authorize $50,000,000 in each of fiscal years 2009 through 2012 for giving these grants to states. It may be that taxpayers should worry more about the bite put on their wallets, but if people want Congress to do something about bedbugs, they want Congress to do something about bedbugs.

Hat tip: Jim Harper

Happy 4th!

In honor of Independence Day, I thought I’d share the document that we celebrate. Read it, damn you:

 

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

Welcome to Heller, DC

In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

Thanks, Nino!

NIH: You Only Think You Don’t Have a Problem (Except That You Very Well May Not)

The National Institutes of Health have issued new guidelines for American doctors to diagnose and treat alcohol “abuse”:

With alcohol abuse […] most physicians don’t go looking for trouble and don’t recognize it until it’s breathing in their face. Over-drinking patients often don’t think of looking for help even if they know they are heading in the wrong direction. And society as a rule looks at alcohol treatment as a last-chance, 90-degree corner taken only at high speed.

All this will change if American physicians adopt the new guidelines for “Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much” promulgated by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, part of the National Institutes of Health.

The idea is to simplify the screening for excessive alcohol use in general medical practice and to convince clinicians and patients that early intervention for drinking that hasn’t yet wreaked havoc is both possible and useful.

“We’re trying to increase the accessibility and attractiveness of treatment to a much broader spectrum of people,” said Mark L. Willenbring, a psychiatrist who directs the Division of Treatment and Recovery Research at NIAAA.

Those especially targeted in the guidelines are heavy drinkers who are not yet physically dependent on alcohol but are at risk for becoming so.

a.k.a. - People who don’t have a problem.

“We know that that group responds very, very well to what we call facilitated self-change and brief motivational counseling. We could make that very widely available without much cost,” Willenbring said.

“Facilitated self-change?” That makes about as much sense as ‘mandatory volunteerism.’

A big part of the new strategy is to make primary care physicians — people without specialized training in addiction medicine — think about alcohol abuse the way many now think about depression, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Yes, because it makes all the sense in the world to equate a conscious decision to drink with an overwhelming desire to kill yourself, helpless panicking, and insatiable need for order.

Look, if your doctor wants to hector you about your drinking, that’s between you and your doctor. But the NIAAA is just another government organization establishing new rules to justify its own existence (read funding).

Heavy drinking isn’t a disease…it’s just a rack of disciprine.

Senate Dems: Here’s Your Sign

Riding the Metro into the Swamp this morning, before I leaned my head against the glass to catch my last few minutes of sleep for the day, I noticed that there were stories in the freebie news rags about the dramatically increased Metro ridership due to gasoline prices. Even the conductor even commented on the number of people saying that “We all know why.”

So, it is with a great deal of chutzpah that the left-leaning codgers in the Senate tried to…get this…increase gas prices to punish the evil corporations:

The legislation at issue called for repealing some $17 billion in tax breaks for oil companies and for imposing a 25 percent windfall profits tax. Companies could avoid the windfall profits tax if they invested the money in renewable energy development or in new refineries.

“The Bush administration has failed to address these concerns,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat. “Sadly, the Republican members of Congress have stood by his side, cheering him on, cheering on the oil companies as they make more money.”

reason’s Ronald Bailey had this to say:

In any case, [the U.S.] has had a previous bad experience with “windfall profits taxes” on oil companies. In 1980, as a parting gift, President Jimmy Carter and Congressional Democrats imposed just such a tax. How did it work out? Not so well. In 2005, the Tax Foundation looked at the issue and pointed out that the Congressional Research Service…

…found the windfall profits tax had the effect of decreasing domestic production by 3 percent to 6 percent, thereby increasing American dependence on foreign oil sources by 8 percent to 16 percent. A side effect was declining, not increasing, tax collections.

http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba549/images/fig1.gif

Great idea, huh? But it gets even worse. In 2005 Congressional testimony, ConocoPhillips CEO James Mulva cited the same CRS study as finding…

…the windfall profits tax that was signed into law in 1980 and repealed in 1988 drained $79 billion in industry revenues during the 1980s that could have been used to invest in new oil production-leading to 1.6 billion fewer barrels of oil being produced in the U.S. from 1980-1988.

So not only does a “windfall profits tax” boost prices now, it reduces investment in oil exploration helping to keep prices high in the future. Let’s call that a “lose-lose” for American motorists.

And by the way, just how much in taxes has Big Oil paid? Back in 2005, the Tax Foundation reported…

…over the past 25 years, oil companies directly paid or remitted more than $2.2 trillion in taxes, after adjusting for inflation, to federal and state governments-including excise taxes, royalty payments and state and federal corporate income taxes. That amounts to more than three times what they earned in profits during the same period, according to the latest numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and U.S. Department of Energy.

You don’t need a Ph.D. in Economics to understand that if you raise the cost of providing a service, the cost will be passed on to the consumer. Hell, you should be able to figure this out with an 8th grade education…or a memory that goes back further than the previous election cycle.

Quote of the Day

From (a letter to) NRO:

[W]e all knew Bush was an incompetent dolt and a liar a long time ago. After all, 50.1% of the country saw this back in 2000. Now 75% of the country realizes it. The other 25% would vote for a chimpanzee if he said he loved Jesus, hated gays and was opposed to abortion.

Gene-ious

While it would probably be inaccurate to say that Gene Healy is a friend of F&S–basically because I highly doubt he reads our site–I can say that many of us greatly admire him. So, it is with great pride that I read this little ditty by George Will singing his new book’s praises:

But then, rhetorical—and related—excesses are inherent in the modern presidency. This is so for reasons brilliantly explored in the year’s most pertinent and sobering public affairs book, “The Cult of the Presidency: America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power,” by Gene Healy of Washington’s libertarian Cato Institute. (emphasis added)

Anyone familiar with George Will knows he isn’t a writer known for overstatement, (save, perhaps, his columns relating to his love of baseball), so such praise is remarkable…and well-deserved.

Radley liked it a lot too.

And if I may throw in my two cents: Gene’s gift for language allows him to go through the history of the presidency without the bloated wonk-speak that often hamper books that come from the think-tanks. It is a very accessible read, well-researched, and has a good amount of the author’s wit and humor to keep it interesting. I highly recommend it.

So, what are you waiting for? BUY IT.

I Hereby Sentence You to Eat a Salad…

From Fark:

RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (AP) ― A Long Island music shop owner accused of selling knockoff Gibson Les Paul guitars has been arraigned in a pickup truck in a courthouse parking lot after his lawyer said the 500-pound defendant couldn’t walk into the courthouse.

State Supreme Court Justice Robert Doyle said the man’s “severe weight problem” prompted the unusual proceeding Thursday in Riverhead. A defense lawyer also had given the court a doctor’s letter saying the defendant suffers from osteoarthritis.

The question I want answered: Was he was in the cab or the bed of the pickup truck?